Submit a Story!
10 Year Nominal-Real Treasury Spread Now at 2%
10 Year Nominal-Real Treasury Spread Now at 2%
The spread between nominal 10-year treasuries ( data ) and 10-year TIPS ( data ) has increased to about 2% this week, up from almost 0% at the beginning of the year. The 200 basis point spread is still below the 250 basis point average during 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and the first half of ...
Global Nominal Spending History
Global Nominal Spending History
macromarketmusings.blogspot.com — As someone who believes that stabilizing nominal spending rather than inflation is key to macroeconomic stability, I... have taken the liberty in the past to reframe U.S. macroeconomic history according to this perspective. Thus, I renamed (1) the " ... (more) Global Nominal Spending History
Comments
Blog Reactions

Thursday links: the carry trade
Abnormal Returns — ... is paying less on its long term debt than Uncle Sam.  (WSJ) Aswath Damodaran on the issues involved with estimating the equity risk premium post-crisis.  (SSRN) Fama vs. Fox on the role of the efficient markets hypothesis in the credit crisis.  (Curious Capitalist) The ten year Treasury-TIP spread has touched 2%.  (Carpe Diem) Edward Harrison, “Why aren’t more municipal ...

Related Content
IS THE "REAL" YIELD ON THE NOMINAL 10-YEAR REAL?
capitalspectator.com 8/14/2009 — The highest real (inflation-adjusted) yields in 15 years for Treasuries are boosting demand, Bloomberg reported at the end of last month. Halfway through August, there's no reason to think otherwise. The 10-year's yield hasn't changed much in ...
The Real Problem was Nominal
cato-unbound.org 9/14/2009 — In this month's sure-to-be controversial lead essay, Bentley University economist Scott Sumner argues that almost everything economists and economic policymakers thought they knew about the role of monetary policy in the recent recession and ...
The TIPS spread
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com 1/17/2009 — Where's my anchor? Many of us have spent a lot of time over the past year and a half obsessing about the TED spread, the difference between LIBOR and the interest rate on T-bills. TED was a good indicator of fear in the banking system; the good news ...
Recovery in Perspective: Nominal GDP Edition
econompicdata.blogspot.com 12 days ago — Remember that "recovery" we experienced in the third quarter? Turns out nominal GDP bounced a "whopping" 3.2% (down 1% from the initial release). Or to put this figure in perspective, the 42nd highest quarter out of the last 251 or one of the lowest ...
The wonderful world of negative nominal interest rates
VoxEU.org 6/4/2009 — Willem Buiter , 4 June 2009 Some economists are arguing that central banks should set negative nominal interest rates. This column explains the basics by describing three ways of removing the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates: abolish ...
Even more on nominal wages
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com 12/4/2008 — A few more notes on the did-FDR-prolong-the-Depression front: 1. Gauti Eggertsson has an interesting paper arguing that NIRA policies, by reducing the expected rate of deflation, were actually expansionary. 2. There have been a lot of responses to my ...
Nominal Nonsense
blogsandwikis.bentley.edu 29 days ago — It’s always a good day when Paul Krugman throws a nice easy pitch over the fat part of the plate. In this post commenting on Beckworth he combines all of the worst features of his blog, in one nice package with a bow on top. Here’s my problem. ...
Chad Brand Interviewed on “Behind The Spread”
peridotcapitalist.com 25 days ago — I recently did an interview with the investment site “Behind The Spread” which focused on learning about the backgrounds of various investment professionals. They are interviewing the genius investors on KaChing and it was my turn in line. If you would like to learn a bit more ...
TIPS and inflation expectations
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com 26 days ago — The same financial disruptions that wreaked havoc with many assets also did some funny stuff to TIPS.
Will stimulating nominal aggregate demand solve our problems?
econbrowser.com 10/7/2009 — In which I join the ongoing debate on how much we should expect fiscal and monetary stimulus to accomplish. Arnold Kling has proposed a "recalculation" theory of macroeconomics: My claim (which is not original with me-- it is recognizably ...