Submit a Story!
Global Nominal Spending History
Global Nominal Spending History
As someone who believes that stabilizing nominal spending rather than inflation is key to macroeconomic stability, I have taken the liberty in the past to reframe U.S. macroeconomic history according to this perspective. Thus, I renamed (1) the " Great Inflation " that started in the mid-1960s ...
Nominal Nonsense
blogsandwikis.bentley.edu — It’s always a good day when Paul Krugman throws a nice easy pitch over the fat part of the plate. In this post commenting on Beckworth he combines all of the worst features of his blog, in one nice package with a bow on top. Here’s my problem. ... (more) Nominal Nonsense
10 Year Nominal-Real Treasury Spread Now at 2%
10 Year Nominal-Real Treasury Spread Now at 2%
mjperry.blogspot.com — The spread between nominal 10-year treasuries ( data ) and 10-year TIPS ( data ) has increased to about 2% this week, up from almost 0% at the beginning of the year. The 200 basis point spread is still below the 250 basis point average during ... (more) 10 Year Nominal-Real Treasury Spread Now at 2%
Comments
Blog Reactions

Nominal Spending Crash
Capital Gains and Games — Further evidence that the decline in spending is our central economic problem. http://macromarketmusings.blogspot.com/2009/11/global-nominal-spending-history.html ...

Reducing Real Compensation
EconLog: Library of Economics and Liberty — ... highlights a post by David Beckworth on the sharp decline in nominal spending in 2008-2009. Alex writes, We could use some inflation to get back on track. Nominal wages are simply not flexible enough to get the job done in short order I would caution that lower real wages are only part of the solution to the Recalculation problem. The process also will involve transitions into and out of industries and occupations. But it certainly would not hurt to reduce real compensation. Some ideas for doing this: 1. Cut the employer contribution to the payroll tax. Bryan first ...

Fifty Years of Economic History in one Figure
Marginal Revolution — David Beckworth sums up a lot of recent economic history in one figure. A few thoughts:  I wish Arnold Kling were correct that inflation is around the corner.  We could use some inflation to get back on track.  Nominal wages are simply not flexible enough to the the job done in short order and there is much to fear from populist backlash. See also the link above for a remarkably similar figure for the OECD which illustrates the US's role of monetary hegemon. 

Truth in Something
Lawrance G. Lux — One of the most aggravating aspects of the different economic schools of thought lies in the fact your primary positions are sometimes challenged. Such is the content of this piece from David Beckworth. I cannot truly evaluate the first Graph without an overlay on Government Spending in the same Period (including federal, State, and Local); this to ascertain that the Spending came from the Private consumer, and not the Government. My thinking holds that Private Spending has actually moderated since 1970, except for the insanity of Home purchasing of the last Boom. The later ...

Nominally misguided (wonkish)
Paul Krugman — David Beckworth has been getting a lot of attention with this figure on nominal spending: And it’s certainly suggestive. But I disagree with the interpretation that this shows that the current slump is mainly about insufficiently expansionary monetary policy. And more broadly, I think that efforts to make sense of recent events in terms of money velocity — such as, in particular, ...

Related: nominal spending
Paul Krugman and Scott Sumner -- who is Nominally Misguided or Speaking Nominal Nonsense?The Austrian Economists
|Peter Boettke| Paul Krugman provides his take on the Beckworth graph showing the collapse of nominal spending and relates it to his 1998 work on Japan. The upshot, monetary policy will not produce the desired effect in our current situation. Scott Sumner responds and continues to push his ...