Submit a Story!
High and Low Finance - Goodbye to the Accounting Reforms of 2002
It took just five weeks after the WorldCom accounting scandal erupted in 2002 for Congress to pass, and President George W. Bush to sign, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. That law required public companies to make sure their internal controls against fraud were not full of holes. It took three more years ...
Comments
Blog Reactions

Friday links: the risk trade
Abnormal Returns — ... ibid) Fewer Harvard MBAs going to Wall Street is a good thing.  (DealBook) A bad week for the widening Wall Street-Main Street divide.  (Deal Journal) The Feds have turned a profit on their financial company debt guarantees.  (NYTimes) Sarbanes-Oxley is about to get “gutted.”  (Floyd Norris also Big Picture) Are central clearinghouses for ...

Regulation Going Backwards
The Big Picture — ... and correct marking of assets. If we really wanted to just help small companies reduce their reporting burdens and maintain acceptable financial controls, how hard is it to exempt an appropriate number of firms with modest revenue. Instead, this is yet another grab for control by the same groups that helped caused the previosu accounting crisis in the 1990s and 2000s. The gall is simply unimaginable. > Source: Goodbye to Reforms of 2002 FLOYD NORRIS NYT: November 5, 2009 ...

Will Sarbanes-Oxley Be A Casualty of the Financial Crisis?
Conglomerate — Floyd Norris says yes, and I must say I'm surprised.  Despite the raft of academic criticism about Sarbanes-Oxley, it is hard to believe that a deregulatory measure would be a popular sell in Congress, though the column is worth a read on that score.  Prediction: if the momentum to revisit the statute is strong enough, it is unlikely that it would not be paired with some financial reform directed at this crisis.  In that sense, Sarbanes-Oxley has made a Consumer Financial Products Agency that much more likely. ...

Lunchtime Links 11-6
Rolfe Winkler — Fannie asks for another $15 billion (press release) That brings the company’s total draw on Treasury to $59.9 billion. Here’s the paragraph that scares me: “Total nonperforming loans in our guaranty book of business were $198.3 billion, compared with $171.0 billion on June 30, 2009, and $119.2 billion on December 31, 2008. The carrying value of our foreclosed properties was $7.3 billion, compared with $6.2 billion on June 30, 2009, and $6.6 billion on December 31, 2008.” Why is the value of nonperforming loans growing so much faster than foreclosures? If Fannie’s not going to foreclose, then why ...

Related: 11/6/2009 floyd norris sarbanes
Public Choice scholars neededNewmark's Door
In "Goodbye to Reforms of 2002" Floyd Norris of the New York Times writes : Sarbanes-Oxley was passed, almost unanimously, by a Republican-controlled House and a Democratic-controlled Senate. Now a Democratic Congress is gutting it with the apparent approval of the Obama ...