Submit a Story!
Jeremy Siegel Says the Standard and Poor's 500 Index Miscalculates Its Earnings
JEREMY J. SIEGEL Standard & Poor's recently shocked investors with an announcement that reported earnings for its S&P 500 Index for the fourth quarter of 2008 are forecast to be negative for the first time since such data were calculated in 1936. S&P further reports that for all of 2008, ...
The S&P 500's Incredibly Shrinking Market Cap
The S&P 500's Incredibly Shrinking Market Cap
bespokeinvest.typepad.com — In an earlier post on the declines that individual stocks in the S&P; 500 have seen over... the course of the index's six-day losing streak, we noted that because of their market caps, if they were being considered for inclusion into the index today, ... (more) The S&P 500's Incredibly Shrinking Market Cap
S&P 500 Now Down 52% From All-Time High
S&P 500 Now Down 52% From All-Time High
bespokeinvest.typepad.com — There have now only been two periods in the history of the S&P; 500 where the index... declined more than 50% from an all-time high -- 1929 and now. In the first chart below, we highlight the percentage change from the S&P; 500's most recent all-time ... (more) S&P 500 Now Down 52% From All-Time High
Tracking the bear: How bad could it get? - Feb. 25, 2009
Tracking the bear: How bad could it get? - Feb. 25, 2009
money.cnn.com — NEW YORK (Fortune) -- Don't let Tuesday's rally fool you. While the Dow roared back more than... 236 points and the S&P 500 gained 4%, Monday's 12-year lows showed that this bear market may still grow bigger and meaner. To start the week, both the S&P ... (more) Tracking the bear: How bad could it get? - Feb. 25, 2009
Comments
Blog Reactions

Are S&P 500 Earnings Wrong?
Bespoke Investment Group — In an Op-Ed in this morning's Wall Street Journal , Jeremy Siegel argued that the earnings for the S&P 500 are understating actual earnings.  While his entire argument can be read here , his basic premise is that Standard and Poor's calculates earnings based on each company's total earnings without taking into account their weight in the index.  Siegal goes on to say that earnings should instead be calculated using each company's earnings times its weight. While the argument may sound convincing, it doesn't really make sense.  The S&P 500 is meant to represent the total ...

"The Science Seemed So Solid"
Random Roger — ... On a related note Professor Jeremy Siegel wrote an opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal making a case for calculating earnings for the S&P 500 by market cap as opposed to allowing the largest company losing $1 to have the same impact on the earnings as a $1 loss when it comes from the smallest company in the index. ...

Searching for the Bottom: Valuation
A Dash of Insight — ... Weighted earnings, suggested by Prof. Jeremy Siegel, who believes that the reported S&P earnings over-emphasize the smaller cap stocks. ...

Siegel on Stock Market Valuation
Greg Mankiw's Blog — A couple months ago UPenn economist Jeremy Siegel penned a Wall Street Journal op-ed on stock market valuation and problems in the standardly computed price-earnings ratio. When I first read it, I thought the arguments were not very persuasive. Now, in a ...

Is The S&P Valued Too Low?
Phil’s Stock World — ... On February 25 I published an op-ed piece in the ‘Wall Street Journal‘ entitled, "The S&P Gets Its Earnings Wrong." In that article I said that, although the S&P weights each individual’s stock by its market capitalization to compute the return on the S&P 500 Index, no such methodology is used to compute aggregate earnings of the index. ...

Jeremy Siegel's False Logic
Stefan Karlsson's blog — Jeremy Siegel has in two articles argued that the current methodology for determing the stock market P/E ratio is misleading, because profits and losses aren't weighted by the market value of the respective company. According to Siegel himself, he has convinced Robert Shiller of this argument, and Greg Mankiw says that he is increasingly convinced of it. In his first article, he doesn't provide any example of his methodology, but he does so in his second article: "My methodology would weight the $45 billion earned by Exxon Mobil by 95 percent ...

Related Content
Yahoo! Personal Finance: Calculators,Money Advice,Guides,& More
finance.yahoo.com 4/9/2009 — On February 25 I published an op-ed piece in the Wall Street Journal' entitled, " The S&P Gets Its Earnings Wrong ." In that article I said that, although the S&P weights each individual's stock by its market capitalization to compute the return on ...
Are S&P 500 Earnings Wrong?
bespokeinvest.typepad.com 2/26/2009 — In an Op-Ed in this morning's Wall Street Journal, Jeremy Siegel argued that the earnings for the S&P; 500 are understating actual earnings. While his entire argument can be read here, his basic premise is that Standard and Poor's calculates earnings ...
Jeremy Siegel is brilliant, uplifting and just plain wrong!
ContrarianEdge.com 3/4/2009 — S&P 500 earnings topped out at about $84 a share in June 2007, while corporate profit margins were 44% above their average since 1980. At the time, these numbers were inflated by global bubbles in real-estate, commodities, liquidity, and growth ...
S&P 500 Index: Now More Poor, Less Standard
tradersnarrative.com 11/21/2008 — While the active vs. indexing argument rages on in the investing world, it is a moot point. Everything is actively managed . The only difference is that some funds are more actively managed than others. (Sorry Bogle.) Every single index out there was ...
How Low Can The Market Go?
businessinsider.com 3/2/2009 — On days like today, it helps to look at the silver lining. Here it is: The farther stocks fall, the cheaper they get--and the higher the expected long-term return becomes. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean we don't have a long way to go on the ...
Likely S&P 500 Bottom: 600, Down 40% From Here
clusterstock.com 11/3/2008 — GranthamS&Pprofitmargins.png The good news: The S&P 500 is trading near fair value. The bad news: If the current post-bubble low follows previous post-bubble lows, the S&P 500 will probably bottom around 600. First things first, however: Long-term ...
U.S.
bloomberg.com 11/18/2008 — S&P 500 Index's `Retest' of Low Fails to Spur Rally (Update1) By Elizabeth Stanton Nov. 18 (Bloomberg) -- The Standard & Poor's 500 Index is poised to extend this year's 42 percent drop after a rally from last week's five-year low lasted just one day, ...
S&P 500 Moving Averages
bespokeinvest.typepad.com 3/11/2009 — Even after today's rally of over 4%, the S&P; 500 remains more than 13% below its 50-day moving average (DMA) and over 30% below its 200-DMA. In order to reach the 50-DMA, the S&P; would have to rally an additional 15.1%. While a rally of 15% seems ...
A 40-Year Look
crossingwallstreet.com 11/20/2008 — The S&P; 500 closed at a 68-month low today. Given that the CPI report came out today, here’s an interesting stat. Adjusted for inflation, the S&P; 500 has advanced just 23.9% in 40 years. Annualized, that’s 0.54%. This means that almost the ...
Prof Jeremy Siegel's Strange Claim: "Stocks Are Dirt Cheap"
clusterstock.com 11/7/2008 — JeremySiegel.png Jeremy Siegel, the beloved Wharton professor who juiced the bull market of the 1990s with his excellent Stocks For The Long Run , has had a rough go of late. First, the "long run" has turned out to be a bit longer than most people ...