Submit a Story!
topics:

Partisan, Pandering, Permanent
(January 28, 2009 08:43 AM, by Arnold Kling) From The New York Times: The economic stimulus plan that Congress has scheduled for a vote on Wednesday would shower the nation's school districts, child care centers and university campuses with $150 billion in new federal spending, a vast two-year...
Comments
Blog Reactions

Seriously, Alpha = 0? Have You Read the Bill?
TRUTH ON THE MARKET — ... government should spend billions proposed for road and bridge repairs, while dairy and beef cattle producers butted heads over talk that the government might buy up dairy cattle for slaughter to drive up depressed milk prices. Unions backed infrastructure spending. States sought budget bailouts. How could anybody look at what is actually in the stimulus package and conclude that the “Alpha” is zero? Maybe Geoff is right . I’m probably just taking Brad DeLong too seriously. More from Arnold Kling .

Related Content
Just Another Partisan Hack
divisionoflabour.com 3/2/2009 — Last summer, ND Sen. Kent Conrad said, "President Bush will be remembered as the most fiscally irresponsible president in our nation's history." Well, here's Sen. Conrad yesterday holding a copy of the Obama budget calling for huge spending increases ...
Avoiding Permanent Losses of Capital
michaelcovel.com 2/14/2009 — How do you avoid a permanent loss of capital? Simple. Have a pre-defined exit strategy before you ever enter a market. What is another way to answer that question? Motley Fool offers this : 1. Shareholders who didn’t anticipate the ...
How Much of the Increase is Permanent?
economistsview.typepad.com 7/25/2009 — [pop-up]
Why Permanent Tax Cuts Are the Best Stimulus
online.wsj.com 11/25/2008 — The incoming Obama administration and congressional Democrats are now considering a second fiscal stimulus package, estimated at more than $500 billion, to follow the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008. As they do, much can be learned by examining the ...
Avoiding Permanent Losses of Capital
fool.com 2/14/2009 — It's a dreadful time for the stock market. Fear has struck Wall Street, and with investors panicking about the future of our economy, stock prices plunge sickeningly. But how do you differentiate between general fluctuations in the market and ...
Permanent vs. temporary increases in government consumption
marginalrevolution.com 2/2/2009 — Paul Krugman writes : ...he [Brad DeLong] fails to note that it’s not just wrong, it’s 180 degrees wrong: a temporary increase in government spending should have a larger impact on demand than a permanent increase, not a smaller impact. I intend my ...
Central banking as partisan politics
blogs.ft.com 6/28/2009 — As long as the financial stability role of central banks remained in the background, the notion of central bank independence appeared to have something to recommend it. Setting the official policy rate is, by the standards of other political ...
Permanent vs. temporary increases in government spending, a Keynesian approach
marginalrevolution.com 2/2/2009 — Let's say government can spend $100 billion today or spend the present expected value of $100 billion, stretched out over time so it is a commitment in perpetuity.  Both spending programs are financed by bonds.  So that's the same net ...