time.com - 1/11/2009
—
President-elect Obama has said that he will run a deficit of $1 trillion to make a meaningful difference in this ugly recession.
Comments
Blog Reactions
links for 2009-01-11
Economist's View —
Why
there's so little good evidence that policy works - Nick Rowe
Social agency and rational choice - Understanding Society
We're
Borrowing Like Mad. Can the U.S. Pay It Back? - washingtonpost.com
The
Case for Bigger Government - Jeff Sachs
To
the Last Syllable of Recorded Time - Bradford Plumer
Compete to give - Interfluidity
Time to Insist on Some Conceptual Clarity and Historical Truth
The Austrian Economists —
... 1960s. And it is not like the names Buchanan and Hayek are unknown to those in the economics profession since both won the Nobel Prize, and Buchanan explained in detail the consequences of the breakdown in the old time fiscal religion and the Legacy of Lord Keynes, and Hayek explained clearly the consequences of engaging in the Keynesian dance of holding the "tiger by its tail" with respect to inflationary monetary policy. So how can it be that we get articles such as these --- Jeffrey Sachs making the case for Big Government in Time, and Yves Smith ...
Scary Stuff
Bear Mountain Bull —
... – Time Magazine is making The Case for Bigger Government . None of them are necessarily good, but that first one sounds like a total disaster in the making. A “savings tax”?? Are you freakin’ kidding me?? Lemme see — you taxed me when I earned the money, and you’ll tax me if I spend the money. Now you want to tax me during the time I keep the money too? Mish quotes Mr. Kaletsky and comments: Near-zero interest rates and even a tax on bank deposits are necessary to force those with cash to use it productively. Instead of reducing taxes on interest payments, the Government ...
And You Thought Krugman Was Bad
Mises Economics Blog —
... He was, and is, but he is not alone. Writing in Time magazine (January 19 issue, online here), Jeffrey Sachs, in an article called "The Case for Bigger Government," makes the case for, what else--bigger government. We need to "restore national prosperity and security with a smartly rebalanced partnership between the public and private sectors." We also need "expanded spending by government--for health care, climate change, energy security, education, infrastructure and peaceful diplomacy." ...
Related Content
Bigger Isn't Always Better... But in This Case, We Believe It Is
youtube.com 11/25/2008 — Over the years we've heard a lot of feedback from you about what you'd like to change about YouTube, and the size of our video player is always top of mind. That's why today we're excited to announce a bigger YouTube player.
We're expanding the ...
Does a bigger boom imply a bigger bust?
blogs.cfr.org 11/10/2008 — For the US housing sector – and the financial firms that financed the boom – a bigger boom meant a bigger bust. Home prices rose higher than before — and now are falling fast.
Shipping too. The Baltic dry index rose high on the back of Chinese ...
The Case for No Stimulus
corner.nationalreview.com 2/4/2009 — For the last three months, Americans have been treated to a debate over what the government can do to ease the effects of the current recession and bring about a speedy recovery. Lawmakers of both parties are now considering a very large stimulus ...
We Are Going to Need a Bigger Stimulus
delong.typepad.com 2/28/2009 — Fourth quarter of 2008 GDP 1.55% below the third quarter level--and an equal decline now forecast for the first quarter.
Paul Krugman says:
Yikes. And if the data on new unemployment claims are any indication (which they are), the economy is ...
My Endowment Is Still Bigger Than Yours
dealbreaker.com 12/3/2008 — Remember when everyone wanted to be able to invest "like Harvard" does? (Of course this really just translated to a massive move into equities and increasing reliance on hedge funds and managers). In retrospect, you could easily called the top for ...
Too Bigger to Fail
paul.kedrosky.com 9/1/2009 — The banks that were mostly too big to fail are now bigger. Maybe if they get bigger yet we can redefine “big” and call them “small” again, thus starting over. [via WashPost ]
The Case for No Stimulus
angrybear.blogspot.com 2/5/2009 — by reader sammy The Case for No Stimulus For the last three months, Americans have been treated to a debate over what the government can do to ease the effects of the current recession and bring about a speedy recovery. Lawmakers of both parties are ...
The Case for Profits
crossingwallstreet.com 1/30/2009 — Arnold Kling argues that what really need right now is profits :
A stimulus will work if and when it serves to increase profits, because profits are at the core of a free market system. The economy will recover if and when profits recover.
Wages ...
The Case for Small-Government Egalitarianism
economix.blogs.nytimes.com 1/14/2009 — An economist writes that the stimulus debate badly needs the voices of that now-rare breed: Andrew Jackson's intellectual descendant, the small-government egalitarian.
Europe Is in Bigger Trouble than the U.S.
baselinescenario.com 2/13/2009 — This is a theme that Simon in particularly has been sounding. Now, according to the Telegraph , a confidential European Commission memo confirms this. To review, the basic problems, relative to the U.S., are:
Disproportionately large banking ...
Predicting Obama's Food Policy —
The Big Money 1/8/2009
On Monday, the New York Daily News blog Mouth of the Potomac passed along a rumor that President-elect Obama was thinking of moving Tom Vilsack , Obama's pick as agriculture secretary, over to the Commerce Department.
read more
Obama to Congress: No Time to Waste —
The Big Money 1/9/2009
Double-digit unemployment. A recession that lingers for years. That's what is coming to America should Congress dither over an ambitious $775 billion economic stimulus plan , its architect, president elect Barack Obama, told the country yesterday. ...
Obama to Get Bailout Cash —
The Big Money 1/13/2009
It looks as if president-elect Barack Obama will get his $350 billion , the remaining half of the TARP fund yet to be spent, the New York Times reports this morning. Despite growing hostility from many Democrat and Republican lawmakers, the ...